Comparing Security Stacks of Competitors
Are you able to help me compare the outward facing security stack of our competitors like FanDual and DraftKings versus our own for TheScore Sportsbook?
Stream metadata hidden
Sandbox Logs4[run_command] mkdir -p /workspace/recon/comp...
Sandbox Logs6[run_command] mkdir -p /workspace/recon/comp...
How much of this comparison is skewed due to the extensive recon and memory for TheScore? If I had you dig deeper into recon and further testing could that make a more realisitic comparison?
Stream metadata hidden
Utilize the Jason Haddix recon framework previously used to much further expand on both FanDual and DraftKings
The competitors likely don't have GraphQL as their API framework, but do they have other APIs exposed that could be further tested and probed?
Stream metadata hidden
Continue your in-depth testing so the security comparisons are fair and equally tested across domains
Stream metadata hidden
Thinking about how TheScore was tested fully with a test account and a WAF bypass header, are there any unfair biases in the results with this breakdown? And can there be any additional tests done with DraftKings and Fandual to make a better comparison?
Stream metadata hidden